Differences between CusA and AcrB crystallisation highlighted by protein flexibility.

PLoS ONE. 2009 Jul 10;4(7):e6214. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006214

{{ author.authorName }}^{{{getOrganisationIndexOf(author)}}} {{ author.authorName }}^{{{getOrganisationIndexOf(author)}}}

+ et al

[No authors listed]

Author information

^{{index+1}} {{ organisation }}

摘要

BACKGROUND:Until very recently, AcrB was the only Resistance Nodulation and cell Division transporter for which the structure has been elucidated. Towards a general understanding of this protein family, CusA and AcrB were compared. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:In dodecylmaltoside, AcrB crystallised in many different conditions, while CusA does not. This could be due to the difference in dynamic between these proteins as judged from limited proteolysis assays. Addition of various compounds, in particular heavy metal cations, stabilises CusA. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE:This approach could constitute a first step towards CusA crystallisation.

KEYWORDS: {{ getKeywords(articleDetailText.words) }}

基因功能

{{$index+1}}.{{ gene }}

图表

‹ › ×

原始数据

保存测序数据

Sample name	Organism	Experiment title	Sample type	Library instrument	Attributes
Sample name	Organism	Experiment title	Sample type	Library instrument	{{attr}}
{{ dataList.sampleTitle }}	{{ dataList.organism }}	{{ dataList.expermentTitle }}	{{ dataList.sampleType }}	{{ dataList.libraryInstrument }}	{{ showAttributeName(index,attr,dataList.attributes) }}

Differences between CusA and AcrB crystallisation highlighted by protein flexibility.

摘要

基因功能

图表

基因

原始数据

文献解读

分析平台

分析平台

分析流程

{{currentAnalyse.title}}