Hormonal and molecular characterization of follicular fluid, cumulus cells and oocytes from pre-ovulatory follicles in stimulated and unstimulated cycles.

BACKGROUND:The use of ovarian stimulation, to stimulate a multi-follicular response for assisted reproduction treatments, may force the production of oocytes from follicles that do not reach optimal maturation, possibly yielding oocytes that are not fully competent. The present study aimed to define the follicular environment and oocyte competence of unstimulated pre-ovulatory follicles, to compare it with that of similar-sized stimulated follicles. For this purpose, we analyzed the follicular hormonal milieu, the oocyte meiotic spindle, the embryo development and the cumulus cells gene expression (GE) profiles. METHODS AND RESULTS:The study population was divided in two groups: (i) 42 oocyte donors undergoing unstimulated cycles and (ii) 18 oocyte donors undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation cycles (COS). Follicular fluid was analyzed to quantify the concentrations of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), FSH, LH, testosterone (T) and androstendione (Δ4). T was higher in the COS group, while Δ4, E2 and LH were significantly higher in unstimulated cycles. The cumulus oophorus cells (CC) surrounding the oocyte were removed and their GE profiles were analyzed with microarrays. There were 18 differentially expressed genes in CC: 7 were up-regulated and 11 were down-regulated in the COS cycles. The microarray was validated by qRT-PCR. The analysis of spindle structure revealed no significant differences between the groups, except for the parameter of length which presented differences. The fertilization ability and embryo morphology on Days 2, 3 and 4 did not show any significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS:The use of ovarian stimulation induces changes in the follicular fluid and in CC GE that may affect immune processes, meiosis and ovulation pathways. Although these differences do not seem to relate to early-stage embryo morphology, the implications of some of the molecules, especially ALDH1A2, CTSL and ZNF33B at the CC level, deserve to be addressed in future studies.

KEYWORDS: {{ getKeywords(articleDetailText.words) }}